Economic and risk evaluation of crop rotation systems: literature review
Avaliação econômica e de risco de sistemas de rotação de culturas agrícolas: revisão de literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22167/2675-441X-2024861Palavras-chave:
conservation agriculture, diversification of crops, profitability, sustainabilityResumo
In many countries, inadequate management of agricultural production has depleted soils to the point of compromising future production in these areas.Thus, crop rotation systems, one of the pillars of conservation agriculture, are presented as an alternative to prevent such losses while regenerating degraded lands. Verifying whether conservation agriculture practices can generate both agronomic and financial gains for producers is crucial for achieving sustainable agricultural production. The objective of this article was to evaluate the current panorama of scientific literature, identifying studies on crop rotation systems published in national and international databases between 2018 and 2023, which address economic and risk analysis aspects of these systems. Articles published in the databases Scientific Electronic Library Online, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, CAPES Journals, and the Base de Dados da Pesquisa Agropecuária (BDPA) were analyzed. Twenty-five articles related to the topic and research objective were identified; 76% presented only studies on economic analyses, while 24% included risk analysis. Regarding the locations where the studies were conducted, 32% were studies conducted in Brazil and 68% in other countries. The year with the largest number of studies was 2019. Considering the theoretical framework presented, the findings of this study indicate that conservation agriculture practices, such as crop rotation systems, present bothm agronomic and economic benefits and can be strategies for reducing the risks inherent to agricultural activity.
Referências
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. 2022. Conservation Agriculture. Available at: <https://www.fao.org/conservation-agriculture/overview/what-is-conservation-agriculture/en/>. Accessed on: Sep 05, 2022.
Fernandes, C.H.S.; Tejo, D.P.; Arruda, K.M.A. 2019. Development of the No-tillage Farming System in Brazil: History, Implantation and Cultures Used. Uniciências 23(2): 83-88. https://doi.org/10.17921/1415-5141.2019v23n2p83-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17921/1415-5141.2019v23n2p83-88
Debiasi, H.; Franchini, J.C.; Balbinot-Junior, A.A.; Conte, O. 2020. Diversificação de espécies vegetais em sistemas de produção. p. 93-118. In: Seixas, C.D.S.; Neumaier, N.; Balbinot-Junior, A.A.; Krzyzanowski, F.C.; Campos-Leite, R.M.V.B. Tecnologias de produção de soja. Embrapa Soja, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Garbelini, L.G.; Debiasi, H.; Junior, A.A.B.; Franchini, J.C.; Coelho, A.E.; Telles, T.S. 2022. Diversified crop rotations increase the yield and economic efficiency of grain production systems. European Journal of Agronomy 137: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126528
Santos, H.P.; Fontaneli, R.S.; Nascimento-Junior, A.; Santi, A.; Dalmago, G.A. 2019a. Avaliação de sistemas de rotação de culturas na análise econômica e de risco, nas décadas de 1980 a 2010. p. 256-307. In: Santos, H.P.; Fontaneli, R.S.; Spera, S.T.; Dalmago, G.A.; Pires, J.L.F.; Santi, A. Sistemas de produção para cereais de inverno: três décadas de estudos. Embrapa Trigo, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Galvão, M.C.B.; Ricarte, I.L.M. 2019. Systematic Literature Review: Concept, Production and Publication. Logeion: Filosofia da Informação 6: 57-73. https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2019v6n1.p57-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2019v6n1.p57-73
Cronin, P.; Ryan, F.; Coughlan, M. 2008. Undertaking a Literature Review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing 17(1): 38-43. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059
Kumar, V.; Jat, H.S.; Sharma, P.C.; Singh, B.; Gathala, M.K.; Malik, R.K.; Kamboj, B.R.; Yadav, A.K.; Ladha, J.K.; Raman, A.; Sharma, D.K.; McDonald, A. 2018. Can productivity and profitability be enhanced in intensively managed cereal systems while reducing the environmental footprint of production? Assessing sustainable intensification options in the breadbasket of India. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment 252: 132-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.006
Fuentes-Llanillo, R.; Telles, T.S.; Volsi, B.; Soares, D.; Carneiro, S.L.; Fátima Guimarães, M. 2018. Profitability of no-till grain production systems. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 39(1): 77-86. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n1p77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n1p77
Santos, H.P.; Fontaneli, R.S.; Santi, A.; Castro, R.L.; Possebom, T. 2019b. Economic analysis of soil management systems and crop rotation. Ambiência 15(3): 535-547. https://doi.org/10.5935/ambiencia.2019.03.03.
Yigezu, Y.A.; El-Shater, T.; Boughlala, M.; Bishaw, Z.; Niane, A.A.; Maalouf, F.; Degu, W.T.; Wery, J.; Boutfiras, M.; Aw-Hassan, A. 2019. Legume-based rotations have clear economic advantages over cereal monocropping in dry areas. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 39(6): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0602-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0602-2
Woźniak, A.; Nowak, A.; Haliniarz, M.; Gawęda, D. 2019. Yield and Economic Results of Spring Barley Grown in Crop Rotation and in Monoculture. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 28(4): 2441-2448. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/90634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/90634
Volsi, B.; Bordin, I.; Higashi, G.E.; Telles, T.S. 2020. Economic profitability of crop rotation systems in the Caiuá sandstone area. Ciência Rural 50(2): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20190264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20190264
Fortini, R.M.; Braga, M.J.; Freitas, C.O. 2020. Impact of conservation agricultural practices in the land of productivity and profit of farms brazilian. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 58(2): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2020.199479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2020.199479
Williams, P.A.; Karanja Ng'ang'a, S.; Crespo, O.; Abu, M. 2020. Cost and benefit analysis of adopting climate adaptation practices among smallholders: the case of five selected practices in Ghana. Climate Services 20: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100198
Klima, K.; Synowiec, A.; Puła, J.; Chowaniak, M.; Pużyńska, K.; Gala-Czekaj, D.; Kliszcz, A.; Galbas, P.; Jop, B.; Dąbkowska, T.; Lepiarczyk, A. 2020. Long-Term Productive, Competitive, and Economic Aspects of Spring Cereal Mixtures in Integrated and Organic Crop Rotations. Agriculture 10(6): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10060231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10060231
Volsi, B.; Higashi, G.E.; Bordin, I.; Telles, T.S. 2021. Production and profitability of diversified agricultural systems. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 93(2): e20191330. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120191330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120191330
Barboza-Navarro, D.; Solórzano-Thompson, J.; Paniagua-Molina, J. 2021. Economic optimization for the cultivation of potatoes, carrots and onions in Cartago, Costa Rica. Revista Tecnología en Marcha 34(4): 38-49. https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v34i4.5184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v34i4.5184
Drakopoulos, D.; Kägi, A.; Six, J.; Zorn, A.; Wettstein, F.E.; Bucheli, T.D.; Forrer, H.; Vogelgsang, S. 2021. The agronomic and economic viability of innovative cropping systems to reduce Fusarium head blight and related mycotoxins in wheat. Agricultural Systems 192: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103198
Dayananda, B.; Fernandez, M.; Lokuruge, P.; Zentner, R.; Schellenberg, M. 2021. Economic analysis of organic cropping systems under different tillage intensities and crop rotations. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 36(5): 509-516. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170521000120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170521000120
He, D.C.; Ma, Y.L.; Li, Z.Z.; Zhong, C.S.; Cheng, Z.B.; Zhan, J. 2021. Crop rotation enhances agricultural sustainability: from an empirical evaluation of eco-economic benefits in rice production. Agriculture 11(2): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020091
Melo, T.R.; Asai, G.A.; Higashi, G.E. 2022. Perception and level of soil and water conservation practices adoption by farmers in a watershed. Revista Ciência Agronômica 54: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20230004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20230004
Devkota, M.; Devkota, K.P.; Kumar, S. 2022. Conservation agriculture improves agronomic, economic, and soil fertility indicators for a clay soil in a rainfed Mediterranean climate in Morocco. Agricultural Systems 201: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103470
Chavan, S.B.; Dhillon, R.S.; Sirohi, C.; Keerthika, A.; Kumari, S.; Bharadwaj, K.K.; Jinger, D.; Kakade, V.; Chichaghare, A.R.; El-Abedin, T.K.Z.; Yessoufou, K. 2022. Enhancing Farm Income through Boundary Plantation of Poplar (Populus deltoides): An Economic Analysis. Sustainability 14(14): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148663
Hoque, M.A.; Gathala, M.K.; Timsina, J.; Ziauddin, M.A.; Hossain, M.; Krupnik, T.J. 2023. Reduced tillage and crop diversification can improve productivity and profitability of rice-based rotations of the Eastern Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 291: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108791
Macholdt, J.; Honermeier, B. 2019. Stability analysis for grain yield of winter wheat in a long-term field experiment. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 65(5): 686-699. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2018.1520979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2018.1520979
White, K.E.; Cavigelli, M.A.; Conklin, A.E.; Rasmann, C. 2019. Economic performance of long‐term organic and conventional crop rotations in the Mid‐Atlantic. Agronomy Journal 111(3): 1358-1370. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.09.0604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.09.0604
Gagnon, B.; Pouleur, S.; Lafond, J.; Parent, G.; Pageau, D. 2019. Agronomic and economic benefits of rotating corn with soybean and spring wheat under different tillage in eastern Canada. Agronomy Journal 111(6): 3109-3118. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.10.0653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.10.0653
Eeswaran, R.; Nejadhashemi, A.P.; Miller, S.R. 2021. Evaluating the climate resilience in terms of profitability and risk for a long-term corn-soybean-wheat rotation under different treatment systems. Climate Risk Management 32: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100284
Khakbazan, M.; Liu, K.; Bandara, M.; Huang, J.; Gan, Y. 2022. Pulse-included diverse crop rotations improved the systems economic profitability: evidenced in two 4-year cycles of rotation experiments. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 42(5): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00831-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00831-2
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Quaestum
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
